That said, he sucks. Thus far, I'm clearly not in agreement with any of his executive orders. I also don't believe in the appointments he's made. And, while it hasn't been proven due to lack of transparency, I think he's got many conflicts of interest with how he makes his nut.
And, the man is a fantastic liar...and regularly requires his staff to cover for him or lie for him. It's a PR shit-show.
It didn't matter then, and it doesn't matter now.
Yesterday, the NY Times irresponsibly Tweeted out a comparison of the 2015 Superbowl Champs visiting Obama vs. the 2017 Champs visiting Trump. What is missing is the fact that in 2015, the entire organization was invited on the stage, vs. just the team in 2017. The staffers were all there...just in the audience. Thanks for jumping on the hate-train, NYT. I'm sure you'll publish a retraction in the smallest of print.
I guess what I'm saying is, I'm all for criticising the President for his wish to reduce budgets for the arts, for his administration's plan for public education, as well as there severe lack of scientific understanding on all levels. Those are legitimate gripes, regardless of the potential benefits for businesses...which I believe will be minimal at best. Coal is still dead, global warming is a thing, and Americans with pre-existing conditions need to be protected against health care vultures. These are issues.
So, and I know I'm guilty of it too, when you see a story about how he announced that he launched 59 Tomahawk missiles against a sovereign nation, pay no attention to the "the most beautiful piece of chocolate cake that you’ve ever seen.” That's not the story...the story is Russia. The story is sarin gas. The Story is the French election or the uprising in Venezuela. Because, we know from history, when you focus on the "cake" part of the story, it makes you look like a fool to the masses, your rhetoric loses value, and you may even lose your head.
see: Marie Antoinette
No comments:
Post a Comment